Sunday, September 22, 2013




          This is a little project I've been working on for awhile, it's a work in progress so I know there are grammar mistakes and it doesn't quite flow yet. I'm writing about an aspect of social work that I thought was common until I had the opportunity to speak with classmates about some of their experiences. One of the BEST things about this MSW program for me is the varied experiences everyone brings to the table. Folks have also asked about what I'm interested in if I'm not interested in therapy, working with families, or doing a lot of direct practice (even thought I LOVE direct practice as you'll see). I want to lead a team from the front, I want to train them to be the best they can be, to give them the tools they need, and to see everyone go home at the end of the night. I've seen co workers get assaulted, I have been assaulted, My team has gotten threats of every kind, yet we're still here.


Sheepdog

          A sheepdog is not a wolf. A sheepdog is not a predator. A sheepdog keeps the flock calm, and watches over it. A sheepdog is a source of strength, support, and  comfort for the sheep, who rest easy because they know they have a protector. A sheepdog is loyal, caring, and will die defending the sheep. A sheepdog is also vigilant, and at a moment’s notice, unequivocally fierce, vicious, and determined. A sheepdog must be willing to face the wolves without fear or hesitation, or serious injury or death can occur. They do not seek danger, but rather are there when needed, when the danger is greatest. A sheepdog can fight with wolves in one minute, and come back and resume their duties in the blink of an eye.

          A lot of people have asked me why I augment/supplement my social work training with defensive mindset/defensive tactics/defensive training. According to Meyers Briggs I am an ENFJ, guardian protector. So my natural inclination is not so much of an outspoken advocate, but more of a silent guardian/watchful protector (yes that was a batman joke). I've always seen myself as someone who sits back and watches, until the need arises, when people are going to need someone who can be both a helper and a scapegoat. If the team dynamics requires someone to be the “bad guy” I have no problem taking on that role. It's not just about personal safety, it's also about the clients, the everyone in the space, and the combination of all these factors. Maintaining awareness at all times and a constant state of readiness. The majority of the clients in the space are well meaning, however there are always that minority that are waiting for a lapse in concentration or awareness. They are waiting for staff to lower their guard so they can conduct their business.

          I've been in the social work field for about 6 years now, the majority of them have been in shelters for youth 18-24. My responsibilities included all the standard social work stuff, support, working with clients, helping them get basic needs met, maintaining a clinical basis and harm reduction model. I consider bad situations  the 1%. 99% of the time there is no danger, you’re applying your skills, and working with clients in a traditional sense. Then there is the 1%. The 1% of the time when you need to cross that line and move into damage control/crowd control/crisis intervention. When the yelling starts, and the screaming, the fighting, the chaos. So why train so hard on that 1%? Because that is the 1% you cannot get wrong. If you haven’t trained for that situation, it might not just be you that gets injured or clients, but your teammates. Someone who has their back turned to you because they believe you’re doing your part, covering them during a crisis so they can do their job.

          Threat identification, threat assessment, threat neutralization. This could be as simple as seeing a client in a situation where they could be a danger to themselves or others (threat identification), figuring out what they need, counseling, space, a time out ( threat assessment) and finally finalizing that plan and getting their needs met and maintaining safety of the others (threat neutralization)
         
          I once had an ex coworker who did not inform me of some important information ( clients who were preparing to fight outside). He did not tell me, and when I attempted to contain the situation, he simply sat back and was on his phone. I had no support and there were only 2 of us on shift. Luckily the intern happened to be there that night and she assisted me. However I still had to do both incident reports and counsel clients about the triggering that occurs during violent incidents, as well as the vicarious trauma that can occur in the milieu. Needless to say that’s part of why I always stress that team dynamics and a good defensive mindset are crucial to time-is-life situations.
          
          My team had to be ready for anything,  and anything included physical and verbal altercations , plumbing issues, suicide attempts, watching for drug transactions, identifying potentially dangerous situations, keeping in mind who was in the space, what the dynamics of the clients were, who had beef with you, gathering intelligence about things that were going to go down, dealing with police fire medical, incident reports, enforcing all shelter/ agency policy,  all the while maintaining social work standards and ethics with an emphasis on harm reduction.
         
           I remember being in the dorm area patrolling after lights out. It is dark, I'm doing dorm checks for 40 clients by myself. All of a sudden I hear yelling from the bathroom. I run in and a client is having suicidal ideation and banging their head on the bathroom stall. Our intern at the time was first on scene and she looked terrified. I immediately put myself between the client and the intern and I told her to call for staff backup. I switched out because I felt she could not handle the situation, and during the debrief I was told by the intern that I was correct. My first instinct is to protect,  and although my manager told me that was the wrong move and that I should not have done that, the sight of a frightened intern instantly flipped a switch and the authoritative, emergency crisis intervention Justin came out. I gave directives decisively, and with no hesitation. I might have come off as aggressive or harsh, but to me the priorities were safety of the client who has in crisis, safety of my teammates, and safety of the 39 other clients.When seconds count, the police are only minutes away. My team had to contain the situation and ensure safety for everyone.
        
          This was where I felt comfortable. Maybe it's the adrenaline rush, and honestly if my social work career doesn't go the way I want I will try and become a first responder (emt/ fire department) The client was causing quite a disturbance, and other clients were triggered. In addition to handling the client, we had to have time with clients to decompress,  make sure they felt safe. One client said "I'm glad you were here" and that made me feel justified in my actions. I went from aggressive problem solver to empathetic counselor in a split second.   
          
          Everyone has their own experiences and views on what social work is. I’m in school to expand my horizons, because I know there is more to social work than my experiences. However I find it helpful for people to be able to say a bit about them, maybe people will get to understand me a bit better, and know why I have such a “boots 2 asses” view of social work. The sheep may hate the dog for barking at them, and may be frightened by what the sheepdog must do to the wolves, but sometimes the 1% happens, will you be ready?

Last minute tips: 

When calling 911, it helps to have your unused ear (the one not up against the phone) toward the threat/situation. That way you can hear things as they progress and update dispatch accordingly

Always be closet to the door. That way in case a situation becomes too much to handle individually, you can make a hasty exit or call for help.

Always move into "known space" this means if you need to move in a certain direction, look first.

When dialing/looking at things, keep your phone up in front of your face, that way you can keep your eyes on the situation and visually keep track of the situation as it progresses.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Alpha Dog Tactical on the 24th!



Hey its been over 1 year since my last post, but I'm trying to revive the blog. I still don't have a tactical ducki hat but I'm workin on it.

Anywho me and my buddy Steve are gonna be partaking in an accelerated carbine course this Saturday, Alpha Dog Tactical is the name of the training
school and I'm pretty excited.

Enough with this, Ducki lets see some guuuns. Well tough I only took a few pictures and I don't feel like hooking my phone up to the computer again. Maybe more pics later but I'm not the greatest photographer.




Left: Noveske 16" with Flat Dark Earth furniture. All black is so 2011.
-Muzzle Device: Battle Comp
-Optic: Burris MTAC 1-4 variable power scope. I was going to run this scope on my primary AR listed below, but I decided to go with the red dot.
-Daniel defense omega 9" rail
This gun is lighter due to the Noveske being a lightweight barrel, but it also has more muzzle rise and recoil due to the battle comp being more of a hybrid flash hider/brake. Slightly faster on target, but less control during rapid fire and controlled pairs/triplets/quads etc. This gun will be more useful in the vehicle course we're taking next month. (also alpha dog tactical)



Right: BCM 20"
-Muzzle Device: Surefire MB556
-Daniel Defense omega 12" rail.
-Optic(s): Aimpoint M4 w/ 3X magnifier, LaRue mounts on both. Red dots are generally the concensus for combat/defensive firearms due to the zero parallax, and unlimited eye relief. If we're not going to be shooting past 100 yards, I will not even use the magnifier and just do red dot.
-LRB Lower-nothing special here it was a father's day sale thing.
-Fail Zero Bolt Carrier Group, which I only like because its shiny. Ok that and it requires very little if any oil.
-RRA Entry stock, because my T-rex-short arms can't handle a standard A2/A1 stock.
This gun is a beast, and if you're not used to it can get pretty heavy. But, whenever you shoot it, there is no recoil, and very little muzzle rise. The blast is not as obnoxious as before when I was using my YHM brake, that shit CRAY. You can ask my friend Steven, but you'll have to speak up if you're talking to his right ear.

And of course what good would all this be if I didn't have a pistol. Now I'm not the greatest pistol shot, but at the distances that we're talking it should be enough. Gonna rock out with my Glock out. I use a Glock 34, which is the 5.32' barrel 9mm. Its like a standard Glock 17, but with an added inch, which as we all know makes all the difference.






Monday, March 7, 2011

Range Trip 3.3.2011

This trip I focused on shooting Russian Bear ammunition. At first when I picked it up it caused all sorts of wierd malfunctions in my G19. However after changing the followers and modifying the mags a little bit, I ran 100 through it without issue. This trip I also took out the old AR, and tested out my 50 yard zero at a 25 yard range.


The Bear ammo....



Russian ammo is notoriously dirty, and this was no exception. I didn't get any pics of the "after", but trust me, it was alot dirtier than when I shoot my usual American Brass ammo. Bear ammo is laquer coated, and is known to jam up guns with tight tolerances, (1911, SIG, HK USP etc) however with the Glock I experienced no failures of any kind, and the glock had not been cleaned from the previous trip either.

Here are the results from the first 50 rounds or so, some shots fired in quick succession, some slow fired:




As you can see, the ammo isn't bad, and compared to the previous trip I took (see last blog post) I actually did a little better at keeping the shots centered. This is probably not due to the ammo, but me just working on my technique.

After 100 rounds you can see some flyers but all in all not too bad. The ones outside the orange were almost certainly caused when I started doing some double taps. Still have a positive effect on target though so its ok.


conclusion: for glock, the brown bear works fine, if you use 10 round magazines though you'll have to change the followers. The 2183 followers used by the 10 round mags are crap, and I have no idea why they switched to them. The 9mm6 followers are much better. (all my mags use these followers now)

The AR.....

I also brought the AR out. It is zero'd at 50 yards and this trip confirmed it. The bottom 3 shots were done at approx 12 yards. I was aiming at the "5" and as expected they shot low, due to Point of Aim and Point of Impact being offset by about 1.5-2 inches. However, aiming at the EXACT same spot at 25 yards gave me 6 shot group right under the "5". These shots were not done using a benchrest so you can see where I wavered a little bit. But, the shots were about where they should be for a 50 yard zero (1.0 to 1.2 inches below your POA)


These shots were done at about 7 yards, basically point blank range for a rifle. The 5 shots directly below the "5x" were done by aiming about 2 inches high. This is because my optic sits high up, and thus demonstrating that disparity between Point of Aim Point of Impact when using a rifle. The shots that look randomly splattered all over were my snap shots. These were shots made quickly after pulling the sights up on target. The one at the bottom right was just bad muzzle control.



Bottom line: shooting is not as easy as the media/hollywood makes it seem!! There are alot of adjustments that need to be made in your head before you can actually place shots where you want them.

Monday, February 28, 2011

Trip with the Glock 19

Today I went and shot my Glock 19. I've been trying to get better with pistols, I prefer long arms (shotgun/rifle) but I'm working on it!



Few things I tried to make sure of today:

#1 every time I fired, I reset the trigger properly, instead of just releasing the trigger between shots.

#2 Maintain proper grip with every shot.

#3 Wait for good sightpicture before breaking each shot. Here are some of the results!

This is the first 10 shots, using winchester 124gr


I was shooting slightly to the left., and you can see 2 distinct flyers. This is still a good group for a fighting/defensive handgun.

Twenty shots same ammo/target

I was still putting the shots in the same place. Still pulling slightly to the left. Probably due to my trigger control. Only a couple extra flyers outside the main group. Still shooting slightly to the left, but honestly I was just trying to place in the orange, not punch out the X.


50 shots...

This was after the full box of 50. The 4 flyers outside the orange are probably due to fatigue. Still, if you know me, then you'd know I'm not satisfied and am actually pretty upset by the flyers.


Double Taps



A double tap is when you fire 2 shots in quick succession. This was a different target than the first one. You can see distinct pairs of shots in this target, and you'll notice the shots are not as grouped nicely. However, when engaging a threat you will want to fire until the threat stops, thus learning to fire in 2s and even 3s can be very beneficial.


Overall this was a very good range trip, and I hope only to improve!

Friday, February 25, 2011

Aimpoint M4 VS Eotech 512

I purchased the Eotech in July of 2010. In January 2011 I picked up the Aimpoint M4. After shooting both, the Aimpoint is my choice, and here is why. Aimpoint is pictured top, Eotech below.



Durability


If you know me, then you know that I value tough products. I'll gladly pay a little more to make sure that what I got can handle some abuse. As you can hopefully tell from the pictures the Eotech 512 does have a strong aircraft aluminum hood which covers the main body. However, the battery compartment in the front is NOT covered. Doesn't mean its fragile by any means, but it is something that I look at.

The Aimpoint M4 is completely encased in an aircraft aluminum casing. Everything except the brightness control dial is metal. There was a demonstration where a rep from aimpoint threw the optic across a parking lot, threw it back, mounted it up and it still retained zero. Thats worse than anything that I would do to my optic so I feel pretty secure. The Aimpoint feels absolutely rock solid.

Battery Life

The Eotech 512, using good alkaline batteries gets about 1100 hours on 2 AA batteries. The Aimpoint M4 gets 80,000 with 1 AA battery. No contest aimpoint hands down. I can leave the sucker on for years and not have to think about it. I'll probably even change the battery every 1 year just to keep it fresh.

The aimpoint power system is so effective at drawing battery life. I took a battery from my remote control. This batter was "dead", the remote stopped working. Using that "dead" battery, I put it in the aimpoint and voila, it still worked. Why? Because the Aimpoint can use the tiniest amount of power to run. My remote didn't even register the battery as having any juice left, but the Aimpoint found some.

The Eotech 512 has an auto-shutoff feature. It automatically shuts off after 8 or 4 hours, depending on which button you use to turn it on. This is a negative for me, because honestly I'd like to control whether its on or off.

As mentioned, the aimpoint has so much battery life it doesn't need an auto shutoff.

Mount



I call mounting options a draw, because I have a LaRue Quick Detach for both my eotech and my aimpoint. I like LaRue because their mounts are solid, guaranteed to retain zero, and are very simple to use. The Quick Detach is a great feature of LaRue mounts, you can take optics on and off very quickly, while still maintaining a solid zero. Also, LaRue will sell you an optic at the standard price and include their mount instead of the standard QRP2 (in the case of the AP).

The Eotech mounts to the weapon system directly whereas the AP requires a mount. However since I use a LaRue on both of them the Eotech's benefit of integrated mount is lost on me. Again have to call this one a draw.

Controls



Here's where it starts to really swing in AP's favor. The Eotech 512 controls as you can see are two rubber buttons, one for lowering brightness one for increasing brightness. The controls on the eotech 512 are not that bad until: #1 you have to lower brightness quickly, #2 you have a Backup Iron Sight sitting right behind it. #3 in my case, the buttons sometimes get stuck, they're rubber and sometimes they deform a little bit and turn sideways slightly, causing them to stick.

The Aimpoint uses a control knob. Clock wise for brighter, counter for dimmer. There is an audible "click" everytime. The control knob as you can see is away from the iron sight/magnifier,thus you can easily reach the controls with one hand without taking moving away from fire control.

When you're adrenaline is pumping, or you're getting fatigued, your fine motor skills become somewhat lost. Pressing little buttons is fine for many folks, but I prefer simply turning a knob, or because the battery life is so good in the case of the Aimpoint M4, not having to hit the knob at all.

Field of View


Field of View. This is where the Eotech is supposed to shine. With its window like display, it offers a wider view of things. The AP, being a tube design, is supposedly not as good, because of"tunnel vision". Let me tell you, tunnel vision is entirely possible with an eotech as well.

If you're shooting close up, then you should have both eyes open. I found that using the AP, I had just as much view of multiple targets/surroundings as with the Eotech. When not looking through the tube, I look over the optic anyway, so I know how not to get sucked into the tube.

Reticle (refer to pics above)

The targeting recticle on the Aimpoint is a simple 2 MOA red dot. The Eotech 512 is a 1 MOA dot with a 65 MOA dot circle around it. For me the simple dot was much easier to keep track of and see. When the Eotech recticle would bounce during multiple snap shots, it would look like a huge blur and it got a bit distracting. The AP's dot, although it did bounce as well, was less distracting. Some people like the big targeting recticle of the Eotech, but for me I can do without it.

All of this is strictly my opinion, there are many people on both sides of the fence, and people who really like both. Eotech makes a great product and I am happy to recommend it for people who like the way it handles. I chose my AP (just like everything else) because it works better for me, and my shooting style/preferences.

VTAC Light Mount


I guess its kinda fitting that my first entry in the blog is my newest acquisition. I'll go back and review alot of the other stuff I've picked up over the past 7 months but I wanted to start small.
A flashlight may not seem like a big deal at the range, but in a home defense situation the ability to control light can make or break you. I recently picked up a VTAC (Viking Tactical) light mount. Its polymer, its light, its 24.99. Seems to good to be true right? Wrong.

This mount is everything advertised and more. I like to mount my lights on the reaction side (Thats left for me because I'm right handed). I can access the push button with my thumb and maintain a positive grip on the weapon. The mount gives flexibility in that you can put it at any position you like. I prefer mounting it on the top rail because it produces the least amount of barrel shadow (thats when you turn on the light and you see the shadow of the barrel, in this instance the shadow is cast at 4-5 o clock and is out of my field of view.

The Light

The light I'm using is a surefire 6P. Not as fancy as my E2D but a great sturdy light putting out an average of 90 lumens.90 lumens is perfectly bright enough to illuminate a room and identify targets/non targets. This is not a long range gun, this is a defensive weapon so I'm not concerned about lighting up the block.




Material/Weight
Back to the mount! Its lightweight polymer may seem like its fragile but think about how much Magpul uses polymers in their products, from magazines to Back up Iron Sights. Glocks, M&Ps, XDs, all use polymer frames. This is not some run of the mill crapperware. Folks have tested these mounts and even with a hot barrell and shooting hundreds of rounds these things last. VTAC doesn't make crap products and this is no exception. This moutn is extremely lightweight thanks to the polymer, and my gun can use all the lightening up it can!



Low Profile
The mount is extremely low profile, meaning that it stays close to the gun. This is great for several reasons. One, it is less likely to snag, get in the way etc. Two the gun will point easier, because you don't have the light dangling far away from the barrel. Think of when your sleeves are a bit too big, and when you try and move around how it gets in the way. Now imagine your sleeves hugging your arms more. Big difference right?

Different light sizes
A great feature of the VTAC mount is the shim, which can be added or taken out with ease. It allows lights from .80" to 1" circumference to be mounted. An example of a .80 would be the E2D defender series. 1" would be the 6P series. This allows you to use a whole range of flashlights instead of having to buy a new mount just because the one you have doesn't accommodate your new light.

Overall
You cannot go wrong with this product. At 25 dollars, its a great investment. There are other mounts (daniel defense, LaRue etc) that are made of metal if that matters to you, but they will cost more. Not to say LaRue/DD aren't GREAT manufacturers. In fact all my scope mounts are from LaRue, and Daniel Defense made my rail system. I'm simply saying that if you're in the market for a light weight low profile light mount, VTAC is something you should look into.